High-rise commercial buildings

Sub Markets

Property Sectors

Topics

Do Corporations Now Pay Lower Taxes? Yes and No

National  + Weekender  | 

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 lowered the corporate marginal tax rate to 22%. That means corporations are paying less in taxes than they did prior to passage of the TCJA, right? Not necessarily.

A WalletHub study finds that the overall tax rate that S&P 100 companies pay, around 39%, is more than 10 percentage points higher than what they paid in 2016. The study also finds that S&P 100 companies pay roughly 65% lower rates on international taxes than U.S. taxes.

And while 16 companies in the S&P 500—including ATT, ExxonMobil, Pfizer and Berkshire Hathaway—pay a negative overall tax rate, tech companies such as Apple and Facebook still incur rates that are at least 15% lower abroad than they incur in the U.S. That continues a trend seen in each of the last four years of the Obama administration.

Regardless, there’s a direct link between the lower corporate tax rate and the growing federal deficit because the federal government is leaving money on the table. Right?

Again, not necessarily.

Tax experts polled by WalletHub had differing takes on the question of whether the current corporate tax structure leaves money on the table. “While the highest corporate marginal tax rate was 35% under the old law, corporations actually only paid an average of about 23%,” responded Stetson University’s Valrie Chambers.

Under the new law, she added, “the highest corporate marginal tax rate is 22%. So, the amount we are leaving on the table may not be as much as some politicians would like us to believe.”

That being said, “for many nations with large infrastructures, the average tax rate is about 22%, and that extra 1% of a very large corporate profit is quite a bit of money to leave behind,” Chambers said. “Looking at this a different way, we are foregoing what may be too much tax revenue while certainly incurring a very large governmental deficit.”

At the University of Kentucky, Bradford Jordan was more unequivocal in his view that “taxing corporations the way we do is damaging to economic growth.” However, he told WalletHub, the real question is why we tax corporations at all.

Much of the tax, said Jordan, comes from consumers in the form of higher prices. “The corporate tax is a cost, so it shows up in prices like any other cost,” he said.

“Higher prices mean companies sell less, so they produce less, so they need fewer workers,” Jordan reasoned. “The need for fewer workers means less demand for labor, and thus lower wages. Workers pay a portion of the tax through lower wages.”

Instead of taxing corporations, said Jordan, “tax things we don’t like. Taxes on pollution and cigarette smoking are good examples. A revenue-neutral carbon tax, including large taxes on fossil fuels, might be a good place to start.”

For comments, questions or concerns, please contact Paul Bubny

Connect

Inside The Story

Read more at WalletHub

About Paul Bubny

Paul Bubny serves as Senior Content Director for Connect Commercial Real Estate, a role to which he brings 16-plus years’ experience covering the commercial real estate industry and 30-plus years in business-to-business journalism. In this capacity, he oversees daily operations while also reporting on both local/regional markets and national trends, covering individual transactions across all property types, as well as delving into broader subject matter. He produces 7-10 daily news stories per day and works with the Connect team and clients to develop longer-form content, ranging from Q&As to thought-leadership pieces. Prior to joining Connect, Paul was Managing Editor for both Real Estate Forum and GlobeSt.com at American Lawyer Media, where he oversaw operations at both publications while also producing daily news and feature-length articles. His tenure in B2B publishing stretches back into the print era, and he has served as Editor in Chief on four national trade publications. Since 1999, Paul has volunteered as the newsletter editor of passenger rail advocacy groups (one national, one local).

  • ◦Economy
  • ◦Financing