National CRE News In Your Inbox.
Sign up for Connect emails to stay informed with CRE stories that are 150 words or less.
Cities Decrease Agency Ratings, While Increasing Debt

Municipal officers and advisers say fewer ratings can help reduce expenses and save time in the borrowing process; bond issuers pay rating firms to issue reports. This is, however, a problem for smaller investors, as they aren’t getting the full picture about the health of a municipality.
Adding to this issue: It’s common for the three ratings firms to disagree about the fiscal health of municipalities
they are asked to grade, especially when the issue focuses on pension liabilities. For instance, while Moody’s and Fitch rely on their own calculations to determine pension liabilities and their impact on cities, S&P relies on government-provided projections. The end result can be a ratings divergence, and more confusion.
For example, in March 2018, Moody’s rated Calhoun County, in southern Michigan, noting that its pension liability was $86 million, or more than twice the figure released by the U.S. government. As a result, in November 2019, the county turned to S&P to grade a new offering of $8 million; the end result was that S&P awarded the bonds a double-A grade, a notch higher than the Moody’s grade earlier in the year.
“S&P is more favorable to Michigan credits than Moody’s has been in the past,” Bobby Bendzinski, president of county financial advisor Bendzinski & Co. told the Wall Street Journal.
For comments, questions or concerns, please contact Amy Sorter
- ◦Financing



