High-rise commercial buildings

Sub Markets

Property Sectors

Topics

Is SoftBank Overpaying for Tech-Firm Commitments?

National  + Weekender  | 

It may be an exaggeration to say that the party is over for big-ticket venture capital investment in growth-stage technology firms. However, the biggest of the big, SoftBank Group’s Vision Fund, is now under scrutiny by major investors who wonder whether the fund has paid too much for its capital commitments.

Specifically, Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF) and Abu Dhabi’s Mubadala Investment Co. have complained about the prices SoftBank has paid. PIF has also expressed concerns about SoftBank’s practice of investing in companies first, and later transferring the stakes to the Vision Fund, often at a higher price, the Wall Street Journal reported.

Between them, PIF and Mubadala have contributed almost two-thirds of the Vision Fund’s pledged capital, according to the WSJ. If they’re not happy with the fund, it could become more difficult for SoftBank chief executive Masyoshi Son (pictured) to “raise fresh money or start a new fund,” the WSJ reported.

That SoftBank’s fundraising style could be cramped is a big deal when the group is accustomed to, well, big deals. Forbes noted that the plan for the Vision Fund is to raise a new fund every couple of years, and invest $50 billion a year.

“To put this in perspective, consider that in 2018, venture funds globally raised $79 billion and invested $275 billion globally, according to statistics from alternative assets provider Preqin in London,” reported Forbes.

Thinking big isn’t limited only to the sums that SoftBank invests. Forbes reported that in contrast to the industry specialization and deep tech dives that are emerging as trends in VC investing, the Vision Fund “looks more broadly across big market opportunities, and well-known and higher-profile companies.”

That approach is reflected in two of the Vision Fund’s highest-profile investments: WeWork and Uber, which now carry “valuations in the unicorn-plus stratosphere,” Forbes reported. “Uber is the second-most valuable startup at $72 billion, while WeWork is ranked fourth at $47 billion on the CBI Insights unicorn tracker.”

More recently, though, the fund appears to have trimmed its sails, at least when it comes to WeWork—recently rebranded as the We Company. Last month, the Vision Fund committed an additional $2 billion to the company, a significantly smaller investment than the $16 billion it was considering as of late 2018.

For comments, questions or concerns, please contact Paul Bubny

Connect

Inside The Story

Read more at Forbes

About Paul Bubny

Paul Bubny serves as Senior Content Director for Connect Commercial Real Estate, a role to which he brings 16-plus years’ experience covering the commercial real estate industry and 30-plus years in business-to-business journalism. In this capacity, he oversees daily operations while also reporting on both local/regional markets and national trends, covering individual transactions across all property types, as well as delving into broader subject matter. He produces 7-10 daily news stories per day and works with the Connect team and clients to develop longer-form content, ranging from Q&As to thought-leadership pieces. Prior to joining Connect, Paul was Managing Editor for both Real Estate Forum and GlobeSt.com at American Lawyer Media, where he oversaw operations at both publications while also producing daily news and feature-length articles. His tenure in B2B publishing stretches back into the print era, and he has served as Editor in Chief on four national trade publications. Since 1999, Paul has volunteered as the newsletter editor of passenger rail advocacy groups (one national, one local).

  • ◦Financing